patrickrunscare
January 7th, 2005, 09:34 AM
I'm not sure if anyone on here will be able to help me, as I've scoured the Internet in search for a solution to this problem, but I'll give it a shot.
Here's the situation...
I've got a box running 98se fully upgraded with all of the patches, ect. It has 128mb RAM and a 13.6gb hard drive that ends up being 12.7 after formatting.
I've got the minimum starting up. Only device drivers, system programs... but no real applications, minus an Adobe Gamma Loader (but this problem was happening previous to this inclusion into my startup folder).
The problem is this, the computer frequently runs out of system resources. One large program (say Photoshop, or Dreamweaver) will completely kill it. I get the Windows warnings and the whole nine yards. Even when I close the programs I do not regain much if any of the system resources.
Now I know that 98 is horrible with memory.. leaks.. ect. But why should it run out of resources so quickly?
And here's the stumper... I had a Win98se box fully upgraded with only 80mb of RAM, and it would rarely, if ever run out of system resources. Granted, it would get slow and then it was time for a restart, but I never actually would get the Windows system warnings, and if I'd close my programs, I could usually get back up to about where I started after a fresh boot.
The only difference between the two setups, other than the RAM of course, is that the latter only had a 2 gig drive. Both are formatted as FAT32.
So, I guess my question is this: would having a larger hard drive be responsible for the system resource issue? It's the only difference in the two configurations.
I've been considering repartitioning the drive into smaller pieces, but I'm reluctant because I don't want to either A. lose data, or B. have to reinstall everything.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Here's the situation...
I've got a box running 98se fully upgraded with all of the patches, ect. It has 128mb RAM and a 13.6gb hard drive that ends up being 12.7 after formatting.
I've got the minimum starting up. Only device drivers, system programs... but no real applications, minus an Adobe Gamma Loader (but this problem was happening previous to this inclusion into my startup folder).
The problem is this, the computer frequently runs out of system resources. One large program (say Photoshop, or Dreamweaver) will completely kill it. I get the Windows warnings and the whole nine yards. Even when I close the programs I do not regain much if any of the system resources.
Now I know that 98 is horrible with memory.. leaks.. ect. But why should it run out of resources so quickly?
And here's the stumper... I had a Win98se box fully upgraded with only 80mb of RAM, and it would rarely, if ever run out of system resources. Granted, it would get slow and then it was time for a restart, but I never actually would get the Windows system warnings, and if I'd close my programs, I could usually get back up to about where I started after a fresh boot.
The only difference between the two setups, other than the RAM of course, is that the latter only had a 2 gig drive. Both are formatted as FAT32.
So, I guess my question is this: would having a larger hard drive be responsible for the system resource issue? It's the only difference in the two configurations.
I've been considering repartitioning the drive into smaller pieces, but I'm reluctant because I don't want to either A. lose data, or B. have to reinstall everything.
Any help would be much appreciated.