Computer Help Community

Community

Cyber Tech Help Community

New Tutorials

PC Tutorials

New Downloads

More Downloads
PC Downloads

Member Testimonials

Open Member Quote   I had been asking every computer whiz I know about my problems and a couple were good enough to come along and have a look, without success then I found CTH...........sensational truely sensational. A million thanks - blr123  Close Member Quote
Member Testimonials
MY CYBER TECH HELP

LATEST TOPICS

Tech Help Community

Free Antivirus Scan

Free Virus Scan and a listing of the top 10 viruses in the wild - Free Antivirus Scan
Free Online Antivirus Scan

File Extension Database

Find what program a filetype belongs to in our searchable File Extension Database.
File Extension Database

Related Microsoft Links

Services
Cyber Tech Help Community

To the top of the page to top

 



Computing News | Justice Department Losing the battle with Google

Latest News Latest News | News ArchiveNews Archive | Cyber Tech Help News RSS Feed!

Posted by: Tweaker
Date added: 23:49 Tuesday, 21st February 2006 GMT
Source: C/NET News

Google

The U.S. Department of Justice's attempt to compel Google to divulge millions of search records could backfire on police and prosecutors.

If Google convinces California courts that a federal privacy law protects Internet users' search terms from a subpoena, it would become more difficult for law enforcement to seek such records in future criminal investigations, legal experts are saying. That's "absolutely" a concern, said Paul Ohm, a former Justice Department prosecutor who now teaches at the University of Colorado at Boulder. "There's a lot of precedent for that kind of thing."

In Google's written response to the Justice Department's subpoena (click here for PDF), filed with a San Jose, Calif., court on Friday, the search company argued that a 1986 privacy law means that it "cannot disclose the contents" of search terms based on a subpoena. A subpoena is a letter from a prosecutor sent without a judge's prior approval or review.

That law, called the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, or ECPA, provides potent legal safeguards for "electronic communication services." Google said that because of features it offers, such as the ability to send news alerts, it qualifies as such a service; the search terms of its users are therefore legally protected, it argued.

"It is time for the government to declare whether search terms are covered by ECPA," said Al Gidari, an attorney at Perkins Coie who co-authored Friday's brief on behalf of Google. "It makes no difference, in our view, that the government wants anonymous search queries. (Its argument) would allow them to search e-mail so long as we removed the customer names."

Last month, the Justice Department asked a judge to force Google to hand over a random sample of 1 million Web pages from its index, along with copies of a week's worth of anonymous search terms, to aid in the Bush administration's defense of an Internet pornography law. U.S. District Judge James Ware has scheduled a hearing for March 13.

It's not clear how often search terms are used in criminal investigations. One North Carolina man was found guilty of murder in November in part because he Googled the words "neck," "snap," "break" and "hold" before his wife was killed. In a CNET News.com survey published this month, Google, America Online, Microsoft and Yahoo declined to answer whether they had received requests for search records from police.

The Justice Department subpoena normally would have been a routine matter, and AOL, Microsoft and Yahoo voluntarily complied with similar requests. But Google's resistance sparked a furor over privacy, with Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, asking the Justice Department for details. A bill announced in the House of Representatives also would require Web sites to delete information about visitors.

There's no guarantee, of course, that ECPA will be decisive in this case: The Justice Department and Google could settle, or the judge could rule on unrelated grounds.

But if the federal courts adopt Google's interpretation of the law, the FBI and other police agencies would find it more difficult to obtain records of search terms in criminal investigations. Similar searches, such as those performed on databases like Lexis-Nexis or Westlaw, or on news sites such as those of The New York Times and Yahoo, would also receive higher privacy protection.

A spokesman for the Justice Department declined to comment Tuesday on whether the subpoena could backfire on prosecutors, saying the matter was under litigation.

Tools:  Tools: Post a comment | Link to this news item | Send to a friend | Submit News

 

Post a commentPost a comment

Error: You are not logged in.

In order to leave comments to news articles you must be a Cyber Tech Help Member.

Registration is completely free!  Register to become a member!  Register to become a member

Along with access to leave comments to news articles you will be able to ask any computing questions you might have on the Cyber Tech Help Forums.

 

[ To the top of the page To top | Latest News Latest News | News Archive News Archive | Cyber Tech Help News RSS Feed! ]